1984
and the Orwell’s greatest fears
George
Orwell hated communism. . . but, more importantly, he hated the unenlightened aspect
of humans that believed it could exist. Orwell’s greatest critique of mankind,
as evidence in 1984 and the blatant use of brainwashing propaganda by “Big
Brother”, is their refusal to believe in the fallibility of what they are
taught. In speaking of England he wrote, “Here one comes upon an all-important
English trait: the respect for constitutionalism and legality, the belief in ‘the
law’ as something above the State and above the individual, something which is
cruel and stupid, of course, but at any rate incorruptible.” He later expressed that, “It is not that anyone
imagines the law to be just. . . but no one accepts the implications of this,
everyone takes it for granted that the law, such as it is, will be respected.”
As a fervent
democratic Socialist from a young age (he once remarked that, after the Spanish
Civil War, he had a revelation that everything he had written since he was a
young boy had been in favor of Socialism), Orwell was a great critic of the socioeconomic
inequality inherent to capitalist societies. “I have spoken all the while of ‘the
nation’, as if forty-five million souls could somehow be treated as a unit ,” he
laments in his dissertation, Why I Write.
“But is not England notoriously two nations, the rich and the poor? Dare one
pretend that there is anything in common between people with £100,000
a year and £1
a week?” Orwell believed that this economic discrepancy was the cause of the
Englishman’s fear of internationalism, or working on behalf of the entire world
and not just one’s own people.
These separate fears
are very apparent in 1984, where Orwell takes his hatred of totalitarian
government and epitomizes it, and what he was afraid would come after the Red
Scare, in the dystopian society of Oceania. The government controls an
unquestioning population with an ever-present propaganda machine, from the
fading posters of the mustached personification of an expansive bureaucracy to
the Two-Minutes Hate, a video clip designed with all the appropriate elements
of making a population despise something they know nothing about. In critique
of political language and propaganda, Orwell wrote that it is “designed to make
lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity
to pure wind.” In 1984, Orwell critiques the Communist’s gross oversimplification
of culture into “good” and “bad” by exploring complex emotions easily bearing
both of those labels—lust, hatred, passion and fear.
During the time of
his writing, however, he saw his fear of these generalizations coming true in
his own country of England, where critiques of Charles Dickens as nothing more
than a “proletarian writer” and Rudyard Kipling’s stories an evil portrayal of imperialism
were pervasive. He viewed these
statements as shallow and uninformed.
Ultimately, the
dystopia of Oceania was the nightmare world of George Orwell—but even worse, it
was the world he saw society headed towards. It remains in popular culture as a
warning of authoritarian and bureaucratic government with a message reaching
far beyond its cult socialist following; Orwell believed that in the end, it is
too much to ask for a society to change. Rather, we can only change our own
personal habits that create this society, and from that, we will best be able
to fight the chains of tyranny.
By: Rachel Gantz
No comments:
Post a Comment